Heard this on NPR this afternoon -- my jaw absolutely hit the floor. From the Progressive Electorate:
Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court ordered a rare innocence claim hearing in the Troy Anthony Davis case.
...
ustice Antonin Scalia along with Justice Clarence Thomas issued dissents. Here's part of what Scalia said
This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is "actually" innocent. Quite to the contrary, we have repeatedly left that question unresolved, while expressing considerable doubt that any claim based on alleged "actual innocence" is constitutionally cognizable
In Scalia's world it does not matter when a person is found to be innocent. The constitution is once again thrown out the window and stomped upon by one who is suppose to be a "wise conservative". Scalia argues past procedure weight over the result of an innocent man being put to death.
Let me preface this diary - I am unabashedly opposed to the death penalty. I've never gotten into to the eye for an eye argument because of its such inherently biased application based on race and class.
Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court ordered a rare innocence claim hearing in the Troy Anthony Davis case .
Davis was convicted in 1991 of murdering an off-duty Savannah police officer, Mark Allen MacPhail, in 1989. Since his trial, Davis has claimed, seven of the state of Georgia's key witneeses have recanted the testimony they gave at the trial. Several other individuals have implicated another man - the prosecution's key witness against Davis - as the shooter.
