Left In Alabama   Follow leftinbama on Twitter

How I'm Voting On Alabama's Constitutional Amendments, Nov. 6, 2012

by: mooncat

Mon Nov 05, 2012 at 23:34:01 PM CST

Election after election, Alabama voters are faced with long lists of amendments, usually with very little information provided about what they really mean.  This election is no different, perhaps worse than most.  Our knowledge is sometimes imperfect and often incomplete, yet a decision must be made.  Here is how I've decided to vote this time around:

YES on Amendment 1 - Extends Forever Wild funding.  This is a no-brainer, supported by the National Rifle Association and the Sierra Club, plus almost everyone in between.  

YES on Amendment 2 - This allows the state to issue new bonds for industrial development as old ones are paid off, with a cap on total indebtedness.  This is Alabama so there's no absolute guarantee the money will be spent wisely or well, but this sort of investment brought Mercedes, Hyundai, Toyota, Thyssen-Krupp, etc. jobs to Alabama.

YES on Amendment 3 - This is a local amendment affecting the community of Stockton in Baldwin County.  It would prevent forcible annexation of Stockton into a nearby city.  Residents could still choose annexation, which sounds like a reasonable situation.

NO on Amendment 4 - This would remove segregationist language from the Alabama Constitution.  Unfortunately, it also seems to remove the part obliging the state of Alabama to provide public education.  Constitutional reform supporters say we should approve this one first and they'll fix the education part next year.  I say send us an amendment that fixes both at once if you want my vote.  With public education at stake, "Just trust us" is not good enough.

YES on Amendment 5 - This is another local amendment transferring the Prichard Water and Sewer to Mobile.  The goal seems to be to reduce water rates, which are currently very high for Prichard residents. The rest of us shouldn't have to vote on these local issues, but because of the outdated Alabama constitution, we do.  In any event, this one is written so that if it doesn't pass in Prichard, it won't go into effect no matter how the rest of the state votes.  Seems like a YES vote from the rest of us basically lets folks in Prichard decide what they want to do.

NO on Amendment 6 - This is an attempt to end run around the Affordable Care Act.  Waste of time, waste of effort, waste of money.

NO on Amendment 7 - This is a cleverly disguised attempt to make it even harder for workers to organize in Alabama.  Definitely unfriendly to working families.

YES on Amendment 8 - This sets pay for legislators at the median household income in the state and modernizes the reimbursement rate for their expenses during the legislative session.  It isn't perfect, but I think it's a step in the right direction -- at least it will stop the practice of paying travel and lodging for legislators who live in or near Montgomery.

YES on Amendment 9 - This is part of the Alabama Constitutional Revision Commission's effort and rewrites section XII of the constitution which deals with corporations, railroads and canals.  I have reservations about this one, but in this instance I will practice what I have preached and not allow the perfect to become the enemy of the somewhat improved.  Anyway, I suspect the corporatists on our Supreme Court will do whatever they like whether this one passes or not, so we might as well get a little reform where we can.

YES on Amendment 10 - The last of the constitutional reform amendments.  This one deals with section XIII on banks and banking.  Among other things, it removes references to the gold standard.  No doubt the Tea Party opposes it for just that reason.

YES on Amendment 11 - Another local issue, this time in Limestone County.  Clarifies police jurisdictions extending into the county from municipalities located wholly outside the county.  Again, imperfect knowledge, but it seems reasonable.

Many people do not vote on local amendments unless they live in the affected area.  I do.  They're on the ballot, plenty of people around the state are going to vote on them whether they live there or not and I figure my judgment is at least as good as average.  So, if I can make sense of it at all, I register an opinion, yea or nay.

AlabamaVotes.gov has a pdf available of the proposed amendments as they appear on the ballot.  It is embedded below the fold, for those who want to read the amendments ahead of time.  Plus, there are links to the legislative act that set up each amendment -- that is where you will find the real details, if you're interested.  Notice that Amendment 11 appears first, then 1 through 10.  It's the Alabama SoS, after all.

mooncat :: How I'm Voting On Alabama's Constitutional Amendments, Nov. 6, 2012
Alabama Proposed Constitutional Amendments
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Share |

I don't trust them (4.00 / 1)
I am voting yes on 1 and 5, and NO on the rest of them.

I won't argue with your decision (4.00 / 2)
It's nice to hear from so many people supporting #1.

Work harder and work smarter!

[ Parent ]
Voted Yes on 1, no on everything else (4.00 / 1)

I probably would have voted on yes on a few if the language had been clearer.

But my general attitude is to vote no unless I have a good reason, because I don't trust those clowns in Montgomery.

And btw, that's also my attitude when the Dems control the legislature.  ;)

My vote (0.00 / 0)

I voted Yes on 1 and No on 2, 4, 6. 7. 8, 9, and 10.  I also voted Yes on 11 but that sort of confuses me.  On the PDF, it's stuck down with the other "local" amendments but on my ballot, it was Statewide #11.  Anyone understand why?  (The only reason I voted Yes on it was pure cynicism.  If the folks in Lawrence County who are covered by a non-Lawrence County municipality's police jurisdiction but don't want to pay for the various services they're getting from that municipality, then go for it.  Of course, if I were the mayor of that municipality, I'd turn around and tell the Lawrence County folks, they're completely on their own.  Then again, having done a Mapquest search of the Lawrence County area, I saw only ONE non-LC municipality that might actually be close enough to have its police jurisdiction fall into LC.  Of course, I really don't understand what the LC folks are concerned about.  Is there a history of towns COMPLETELY OUTSIDE LC trying to impose taxes on folks living inside LC but within those towns' police jurisdictions?  As the commercial used to say, "Enquiring minds want to know.")

As to Amendment 5, I have to admit there was part of me wanting to vote No on it.  From the wording of the original act, this STATEWIDE amendment could actually be passed even if an overwhelming majority of the state were to vote No on it.  (The original act specifies that only the votes of the specific precincts covered by the Mobile and Prichard water and sewer boards will actually count.)  Compare this to Amendment 3 which could lose if you had enough statewide voters vote No but everyone in Baldwin County voted yes.



blog advertising is good for you


Be part of the state's largest & fastest growing Democratic grassroots organization. To receive our newsletter, text OTMDEMS to 22828. Follow us on Facebook.



Advanced Search

A community blog for progressive politics, ideas and current events in Alabama. Register now to join the conversation.

Friend and Follow Left In Alabama:

Join LIA's Facebook Page Go To LIA's Twitter Page Go To LIA's Flickr Photo Album Go To LIA's YouTube channel

- Mobile

Make a New Account



Forget your username or password?

LiA Contributors
- Admin
- Admin
- Economics & Aeronautics
- National Political Issues
- Political Strategy & Messaging
- Health Care
- Education in the Black Belt
- ADP Watch
- Climate & Alternative Energy
- Labor
- Alabama Legal Issues
- From the Center
- Equal Rights & GLBT Issues
- Roving Reporter

Please take our Blog Reader Project survey.

Support Left in Alabama with a Donation!

Your Amazon purchases can help fund this blog:
Support Left in Alabama
Buy Phones & More at Amazon Wireless


T.H.E. Social Work Agency
Adoption home studies & care management services in the North Alabama area.
Licensed, certified, caring social workers.

blog advertising is good for you

Bessemer Opinions
Birmingham Blues
Birmingham Science Examiner
Greg Varner's Blog
The Haze Filter
Hard Boiled Dreams of the World
King Cockfight
Legal Schnauzer
Loretta Nall
Peace Takes Courage
Pippa Abston's Blog
TJ Beitel
Thoughts & Rants of an Independent
Time is Spherical, Not Linear
WriteChic Press

ACLU of Alabama
Alabama Arise
Alabama Citizens for Constitutional Reform
Alabama Conservationist
Alabama Democratic Conference
Alabama Democratic Party
Alabama Legislature
Alabama Poverty Project
Alabama Secretary of State's Office
Encyclopedia of Alabama
Equality Alabama
Greater Birmingham Ministries
League of Women Voters of Alabama
Madison County Democrats
Marshall County Democrats
Over the Mountain Democrats
Alabama Political Reporter

Blog for Democracy
Blue Oklahoma
Burnt Orange Report
Daily Kingfish
Facing South
The Old Black Church
West Virginia Blue
Juanita Jean - Texas

Anzalone Liszt Research
Center for American Progress
FEC Electronic Report Retrieval
Follow the Money
In Their Boots
New Organizing Institute
Pew Research Center
Progressive States Network
The Contributor


 Subscribe in a reader

Add to My AOL

Powered by FeedBurner

Powered by: SoapBlox