Major fail, Leadership Huntsville!
Y'all have scheduled way to much time for rightwing radio host Dale Jackson to expound on "what we need to know." Even the most long-winded Limbaugh wannabe can't spend over an hour saying Democrats vote on Wednesday ... unless there's an election going on.
According to the Huntsville Times, “Jackson said Tuesday that if people were dumb enough to fall for his stunt and didn’t turn out to vote today, it was their own fault,” a statement remarkable in its unapologetic self-absolution.
Maybe he'll bring the state seal for show and tell. Click on the flyer for a larger (still grainy) image.
Folks, if this is an example of the kind of leadership Huntsville has to look forward to, we're in a world of hurt.
To post this comment click here:
Otherwise click cancel.
"The People Who Choose What We Need to Know" is where I can see Dale being invited. "Need" is where it gets trickiest for me. I can appreciate the idea that Dale's job is largely to make Cumulus money and that being an "entertainer" (el Rushbo's term) or "rodeo clown" (Glenn Beck's term) drives market share. Maybe he's also aware of where his audience is and talks/types accordingly. Then again, I've been pleased to recently read him briefly scold some factions in the clearly dominant party in Alabama. I also accept that self-promoting seems to be part of the talk radio culture. If a bloviating, intellectual lightweight like Sean Hannity can move up from Athens, Alabama to such fame and fortune, surely Dale has to think about advancing. Top "talent" in his field can make some serious money with books, talks, and such.Still, is what's different for any of these others who've been invited somewhat a matter of the media in which they work? I understand there are rules or standards for actual journalists but does that hold for people working in talk radio or other infotainment formats?
Maybe events like this will have Dale thinking about the responsibility which comes with that microphone and keyboard? Again, what do we "need" to know and how can talk radio or other media best make that decision? Surely it can't just be about market shares and such low measures. If so, isn't it a race to the bottom? Hope springs eternal possibly that good can come of this event yet optimism is part of being a good lefty isn't it?A larger question is how media consolidation, techonogy changing the print model, and returns on investment influence much of what citizens can easily hear and read. (I personally find the idea of subsidizing non-profits in gathering, then printing and/or transmitting, news attractive yet figure that's a hard sell in today's climate.) I worry that with the Newhouse papers slashing, as well as Gannett trimming, folks here in Alabama may be longing for a vibrant and responsible press.
Respectfully, john gunn
But for the bloviators entertainers on talk radio, veracity is optional ... sometimes it even seems undesireable. The "Democrats vote on Wednesday" episode is a prime example. He was unabashed by what he'd done.
It isn't about "choosing what we need to know" for those folks -- it's somewhere between "choosing how we can make the most money" and "choosing how we can best advance our philosophical agenda." Neither has much in common with journalism.
Dale and his ilk are paid to push an agenda. That they may have drunk the koolaid and believe everything they say is immaterial. When Dale or any of them opens his mouth in front of a microphone, he is a propagandist for the .01%.
And the .01% today have a propaganda machine that Stalin would envy...
A community blog for progressive politics, ideas and current events in Alabama. Register now to join the conversation.
Please take our Blog Reader Project survey.
Support Left in Alabama with a Donation!
Subscribe in a reader