Left In Alabama Follow leftinbama on Twitter

Online Virtual Charter Schools Don't Work In Other States - But Alabama May Try Them Anyway

by: countrycat

Mon Apr 09, 2012 at 06:00:00 AM CDT


Call it "the power of money." The nation's largest online education provider & target of shareholder lawsuits alleging fraud - K12.Inc - has "taken an interest" in the "Education Options Act" (HB541) say the company's lobbyists.  The EOA allows the limited establishment of charter schools in Alabama. Early in the process, a provision that would have specifically prohibited "virtual charter schools" was removed. That's an important point because a number of online education companies want a piece of the charter school pie. Charter schools

 Decatur Daily reporter Eric Fleischauer has already noted many problems with the bill. Today, reporter George Altman reported on another one: "bill could pave the way for virtual charter schools in Alabama."  Like so many issues being debated by the Alabama Legislature - all the high-minded rhetoric aside - this is all about money:

Supporters say that virtual learning helps children under-served by traditional classrooms such as students who are very advanced, remedial or have unique educational needs.
[...]
Others -- particularly charter school opponents -- say online learning is a bad idea in grade school because young students need structure and social interaction.

Additionally, the specter of K12, a Virginia-based company that made $522 million in revenue last year, and other large businesses dipping into the state’s Education Trust Fund has stirred fears.

Yes, that's one fear. 

But the bigger issue is that these online education academies don't seem to be working for students all that well - and formerly bullish investors are becoming skittish.  The company is desperate for new customers and Alabama could be the next target of their marketing blitz.

Will the K12's aggressive lobbyists succeed in obscuring these issues that have troubled the company in other states?  Possibly so, if the company's lobbying activities across the country are any indication:

K12 has hired lobbyists from Boise to Boston and backed political candidates who support school choice in general and virtual education in particular. From 2004 to 2010, K12 gave about $500,000 in direct contributions to state politicians across the country, with three-quarters going to Republicans, according to the National Institute on Money in State Politics.

“We understand the politics of education pretty well,” Packard told investors recently.

Given that corporate mindset, it's no surprise that the company is facing criticisms of its methods and results:

  • Churn rates:  student turnover at K12 virtual academies in Ohio, Colorado, and California is as high as 51% per year.
  • Teacher to marketing ratios:  K12 CEO, Ronald J. Packard,calls "lobbying state officials a "core competency" of the company.  Perhaps that's why the marketing-to-teacher ratio in staffing is 3 to 1.
  • Poor results in other states: A Standford University study (PDF) of Pennsylvania cyber schools found that "in every subgroup, with significant effects, cyber charter performance is lower."
  • Education on the cheap: States can save money by contracting for higher class sizes with less experienced teachers.  Meanwhile, CEO Packard was paid $2.6 million in compensation in 2010 (read: money that came from taxpayer coffers).

More info on all three on the flip, but first, let's look at K12.inc's operations in more detail....

countrycat :: Online Virtual Charter Schools Don't Work In Other States - But Alabama May Try Them Anyway

The company has experienced falling stock prices this year, following a December 2011 expose in the New York Times that described

"a company that tries to squeeze profits from public school dollars by raising enrollment, increasing teacher workload and lowering standards." 

Barely a month later, K12 was hit with this blow:

A shareholder in Virginia-based K12 Inc. has filed a lawsuit against the virtual-schools operator in federal court, alleging that the firm violated securities law by making false statements to investors about students’ poor performance on standardized tests.

The class-action complaint, filed Monday in U.S. District Court in Alexandria, also accuses K12 of boosting its enrollment and revenues through “deceptive recruiting” practices.

 

           Turnstiles As A Company Logo

In a devastating article about K12 published in February of this year, KeepingAlpha.com (an investment analysis & reporting site), cited numerous problems with K12's student retention and business model.

Citing statistics from four of the "virtual academies" run by K12, reporter Roddy Boyd found extremely high levels of annual student "churn," or turnover:

  • Agora (Pennsylvania): 35.5% churn
  • Ohio Virtual Academy: 51.5% churn
  • Colorado Virtual Academy: 36.1%

Chief executive Ron Packard has remarked that K12 has only begun to tap into the vast potential of its marketplace, using the phrase “manifest destiny” in a conference call with analysts to describe his hope that a K12 education would be available to every American child. These withdrawal numbers suggest a different destiny. There is a very good chance the company has drained the pool of the students most able to succeed in a virtual school–the ones coming from families who are willing to conduct themselves as home-schoolers and spend four-to six-hours daily directly involved with their child’s education–and will have to settle for an increasingly marginal applicant.

There is a lot more churn to come, in other words.

Who's in the school and who's not?  Let's just say that recordkeeping isn't a priority for K12.  They enroll the student, pocket the money, and often look the other way about attendance & performance:

One of the 81 incomplete IEPs that had annoyed Agora’s Corcoran was of a special education student categorized as “absent” for 141 straight days, but who had not formally withdrawn, so even though he hadn’t attended the school since the early autumn, his home district still (apparently) reimbursed Agora.

    

       Corporate Philosophy: Sell, Sell, Sell!  Instead of Learn! Learn! Learn!

K12 spent $26 million on advertising in 2010. And a lot of that money goes into aggressive recruitment where it's more important to sign up a student than to evaluate whether the student is a good fit for virtual learning.

“Some of the cyber charter schools have fairly aggressive recruitment campaigns,” said Jim Buckheit, executive director of the Pennsylvania Association of School Administrators. “They have vans, billboards, TV and radio ads. They set up recruitment meetings in area hotels and invite parents to come.”

All this marketing and lobbying money is coming from money that state and the federal government pay this company to educate students. 

The "education" process works like this, say teachers employed by the company in Ohio:

At Agora, enrollment has reached 8,836, up from 6,323 in May, according to figures released by the school. As of late November, the total number of staff members — 408 — was lower than last year. Some high school teachers said they were managing as many as 270 students, even though they had been told they would have 150.

And the lobbying/conflict of interest works like this, according to the New York Times:

In Pennsylvania, where K12 Inc. collects about 10 percent of its revenues, the company has spent $681,000 on lobbying since 2007. The company also has friends in high places. Charles Zogby, the state’s budget secretary, had been senior vice president of education and policy for K12. In a statement, Mr. Zogby said he still owned a small number of K12 shares, but did not make decisions specifically affecting online schools.

It seems like a simple question: Why does it cost the same to educate students online from home as in traditional brick and mortar schools unless profit is the driving factor? 

At virtual schools, student to teacher ratios are high, there's no infrastructure, no bus, no library, cafeteria, no sports teams, and no support staff.  No wonder they have plenty of taxpayer-provided campaign cash to toss around.

Plenty of people are asking these same questions:

But even some supporters of virtual schools question whether online operators are charging taxpayers fairly.

“They have no business trying to charge as much as the brick-and-mortar schools, at least over time,” said Finn, of the Fordham Institute, which has commissioned a study of the cost of online schools. “Once you’ve got the stuff that you’re going to use for fourth-grade math, for instance, you don’t really need to do much with it. And it should be cheaper.”


Read more here: http://www.idahostatesman.com/2011/12/06/1905899/leader-in-the-virtual-schoolmovement.html#storylink=cpy

     

            But Do These Schools Work?

Cyber-schooling doesn't appear to work well for the bulk of students.  Aside from the astronomical "churn rates," the students who stay in the programs seem to lag in performance according to Standford researchers:

Devora Davis, the center’s research manager, said the group’s analysis of Pennsylvania online schools showed that students were slipping. “If they were paired with a traditional public schools student, the public school student kept their place in line, and the cyberstudent moved back five spots,” she said.

An analysis by the Carroll County Public School District in Virginia shows that the 400 students in the virtual program there performed worse than the regular students in 19 of 26 categories on the state assessment test.

And a Rand Corporation (PDF) study of charter schools (both brick & virtual) found mixed results, but did single out virtual charter schools in Ohio:

In the 2008–09 school year, 34 of Ohio’s 328 charter schools were virtual charter schools, serving approximately 22 percent of charter students statewide. Table 3.4 displays the results of student fixed-effect achievement analyses for virtual charter schools versus classroom-based charter schools in Ohio. The estimates for the virtual charter schools are negative, substantial, and (in three of four estimates) statistically significant. In contrast, all estimates for nonvirtual schools are close to 0 and not statistically significant. When we limit the analysis to nonprimary charter schools (which, in Ohio’s data, means middle schools), the impact estimates are almost unchanged: Virtual charter middle schools lag substantially behind classroom-based charter middle schools (which show effects comparable to those of conventional middle schools).  (pp. 40-41)

In another report, the Rand Corporation analyzed charter school performance in California.  In every category in the graph below, virtual charter schools lagged in student performance:

Rand Corporation Study of charter school performance

What might be the problem?  The Idaho Statesman described the "virtual" school process:

Virtual class sizes tend to be larger than at traditional schools — the Virginia Virtual Academy, public institution run by K12, averages 60 students per teacher. So in the primary grades, the model relies on the intensive work of a parent “learning coach,” who provides most lessons away from the computer, using books and 90 pounds of other educational materials shipped to families by K12.

In the higher grades, the bulk of learning is online, with software that sometimes aims to mimic real-life experiences for students, such as a high school biology lab featuring an animated frog dissection.

Teachers monitor student progress, grade work and answer questions by email or phone. They work from home, aren’t likely to be unionized and earn as much as 35 percent less than their counterparts in regular schools, according to interviews with former K12 teachers.


Read more here: http://www.idahostatesman.com/2011/12/06/1905899/leader-in-the-virtual-schoolmovement.html#storylink=cpy

 

           Education On The Cheap

How do you get teachers to work with such large classes and do it for so little money?  You hire less experienced teachers.  K12's chief competition in the virtual school business offers this tasty little package of options and per student price points for schools to choose from:

Option A: $7,500, a student-teacher ratio of 35-40 to 1, and an average teacher salary of $45,000.

Option B: $6,500, a student-teacher ratio of 50 to 1, with less experienced teachers paid $40,000.

Option C: $4,800 and a student-teacher ratio of 60 to 1, as well as a narrower curriculum.

It's not just an issue with inexperienced, overwhelmed teachers.  Because the teachers are overwhelmed and also because smaller children, of course, need more guidance than older, more advanced, students, parents are increasingly thrust into the role as teacher.  Only the K12 marketing literature calls them "learning coaches."  As Boyd sardonically noted in his KeepingAlpha report:

“Learning Coach” is a marketing term designed to be more palatable to prospective enrollees than “Parents-who-make-Johnny-turn-off-World of Warcraft-and-do-geometry-every-single-thankless-day.”
[...]
In an economy such as this, where both parents are likely working harder than ever to make ends meet–if there are even two parents or guardians in the picture to teach children–students from households that lack the “home-school” orientation are the preponderance of students who are withdrawing from the virtual academies.

Teachers agree, as one told the New York Times:

“When you have the television and the Xbox and no parental figure at home, sometimes it’s hard to do your schoolwork,” said one Agora teacher, who asked not to be identified because of concerns over job safety.

For the parents who do succeed as "Learning Coaches," it's almost a full-time job (naturally: that's why we - ahem - pay teachers to do it!).  As the NYT reported:

In a neighborhood teetering on the edge of middle class, Ms. Alhammadi has converted her living room into a classroom. Two desks are for her children, Romeo, 13, and Yasmine, 8.
[...]
Within weeks of attending a K12 information session, Ms. Alhammadi had become parent and teacher, wrapped into one. She spends as much as six hours a day as the official “learning coach” for her children.

I've been researching charter schools for a month or so and have been trying to turn my 19 pages of notes into a coherent narrative of blog posts - much like we did in our 2010 series on state education lotteries.

I've found charter school success stories and tales of failure and corruption.  It's a mixed bag and - like most things - if you do the schools right, things will probably work out.  Maybe.

But I've found very little data that supports the widescale use of virtual charter schools.  So when that news article caught my eye about K12 lobbyists being "interested" in Alabama, I thought I should at least present that part of the research ASAP.

Please share this with your friends, family, and legislators.  There may actually be a place for brick and mortar charter schools in Alabama - but this "virtual school" option seems to work for a small minority of students.  With as much as we've written about the problems with rural broadband and broadband access in Alabama, do legislators really think this is a good idea?  How will poor students in isolated areas possibly sit around and watch educational videos on computers they don't have using broadband that's not available?

Let's let K12 & similar companies line their pockets in other states.  We don't need them in Alabama.

 

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Share |

Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory (4.00 / 2)

Last year Republicans in the legislature took a fairly popular idea, immigration reform, and made it much less popular by passing an incredibly poorly written piece of legislation full of what they called unintended consequences.

Ever since the subject of charter schools for Alabama came up back in 2009, when Obama was pushing Race to the Top, it's been pretty clear to me that charters can work, and in some states they do work as well as public schools, but the key is to have a really well thought out, well researched, law authorizing them.  If the Republicans are hell-bent on bringing charter schools to Alabama, they need to look at the states where charters are performing best and copy the law there.

Will they do that?  Will pigs fly?

No, the Republicans are so overconfident and in such a hurry to do something, anything on charter schools, that they're going to let lobbyists write our laws and create profit centers for fly by night virtual classroom companies.  This is a scam to move tax money from public schools to the pockets of outfits like K12, and it's going to be aided and abetted by the so-called ethical GOP majority in the legislature.  Shame on them. 



Work harder and work smarter!

Education Fraud (0.00 / 0)

Let's just call it what it is.

This is just a new way to rip off state & local governments - in other words, US!



Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.
- John Adams


 

PREMIUM AD

blog advertising is good for you

 

Be part of the state's largest & fastest growing Democratic grassroots organization. To receive our newsletter, text OTMDEMS to 22828. Follow us on Facebook.

 

SEARCH




Advanced Search



A community blog for progressive politics, ideas and current events in Alabama. Register now to join the conversation.


Friend and Follow Left In Alabama:

Join LIA's Facebook Page Go To LIA's Twitter Page Go To LIA's Flickr Photo Album Go To LIA's YouTube channel

MENU
- Mobile

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


LiA Contributors
- Admin
- Admin
- Economics & Aeronautics
- National Political Issues
- Political Strategy & Messaging
- Health Care
- Education in the Black Belt
- ADP Watch
- Climate & Alternative Energy
- Labor
- Alabama Legal Issues
- From the Center
- Equal Rights & GLBT Issues
- Roving Reporter

Please take our Blog Reader Project survey.

Support Left in Alabama with a Donation!

Your Amazon purchases can help fund this blog:
Support Left in Alabama
Buy Phones & More at Amazon Wireless


STANDARD ADS

T.H.E. Social Work Agency
Adoption home studies & care management services in the North Alabama area.
Licensed, certified, caring social workers.


blog advertising is good for you


ALABAMA BLOGS
Bessemer Opinions
Decaturish
Birmingham Blues
Birmingham Science Examiner
freeThinkBham
Greg Varner's Blog
The Haze Filter
Hard Boiled Dreams of the World
King Cockfight
Legal Schnauzer
Loretta Nall
OsborneInk
Peace Takes Courage
Pippa Abston's Blog
TJ Beitel
Thoughts & Rants of an Independent
Time is Spherical, Not Linear
WriteChic Press

ALABAMA RESOURCES
ACLU of Alabama
Alabama Arise
Alabama Citizens for Constitutional Reform
Alabama Conservationist
Alabama Democratic Conference
Alabama Democratic Party
Alabama Legislature
Alabama Poverty Project
Alabama Secretary of State's Office
Encyclopedia of Alabama
Equality Alabama
Greater Birmingham Ministries
League of Women Voters of Alabama
Madison County Democrats
Marshall County Democrats
Over the Mountain Democrats
Alabama Political Reporter

SOUTHERN BLOGS
Blog for Democracy
Blue Oklahoma
Burnt Orange Report
Daily Kingfish
Facing South
KnoxViews
The Old Black Church
plezWorld
West Virginia Blue
Juanita Jean - Texas

RESOURCES
Racetracker
Anzalone Liszt Research
Center for American Progress
FEC Electronic Report Retrieval
Follow the Money
In Their Boots
New Organizing Institute
Opensecrets
Pew Research Center
Pollster
Progressive States Network
Stateline
The Contributor

Subscribe

 Subscribe in a reader

Add to My AOL

Powered by FeedBurner


Powered by: SoapBlox