Left In Alabama   Follow leftinbama on Twitter

Alabama's History of Missed Opportunities: A Constitution Built on White Supremacy

by: countrycat

Mon Jun 14, 2010 at 15:15:16 PM CDT

The Alabama Democratic State Campaign Committee did a literature drop in 1901 that said this:

White Supremacy, Honest Elections, and the New Constitution, One and Inseparable

Alabama constitutionPerhaps the Alabama Democratic Party of the time thought that was a bang up campaign slogan, but I bet most of us would call it an oxymoron.  Just how does a state have "honest elections" while guaranteeing "white supremacy?"

And why did Alabama need a new Constitution in 1901 anyway? What could possibly have happened since 1875 that required such a big change?

As always, it depends on who you ask. Either it was those reformers who came close to uniting poor whites and blacks into a coalition against big business and big landowners or it was.... well.... no, that was the main reason.  Monied interests in the state knew that their hegemony depended on continued racial strife.

"Divide and conquer."  It's not just a slogan.  It's been the keystone of Alabama's system of government for over 100 years.

Before going farther, you might want to check out the first post in this series, "The Progressive Movement & Reuben Kolb," for a retrospective of the Alabama Progressive movement that so terrified the Bourbons that they handed us this wreck of a state constitution.

countrycat :: Alabama's History of Missed Opportunities: A Constitution Built on White Supremacy

Let's look first at the Constitution of 1875 - the one that had to be replaced.  When you read about it in Harvey H. Jackson III's article, it sounds about like what we have now:

The Bourbon constitution of 1875 was a victory for prosperous rural and small-town Alabamians who did not want to pay taxes to improve the lives of those less fortunate than themselves and who did not want to finance commercial development that did not benefit them directly. In particular, it was a victory for planters and merchants who dominated the Black Belt economy and government and who expected to maintain that domination (along with their influence on the state level) by controlling the black vote in their region.

But everybody wasn't doing well.  Not at all:

While planters and merchants were doing well enough, times were not good for Alabama's small farmers. Postwar taxes, a nationwide financial panic in the 1870's, high interest rates and general decline in cotton prices drove many once-independent yeomen off their land and into sharecropping and tenant farming, where landless blacks were already. 

Those people, realizing they were shut out of conventional party politics, turned to the "Farmer's Alliance"  and came close to gaining control of state government.

What really spooked the Bourbons (the big money guys) was that the Farmer's Alliance brought together the underclasses.  If the poor white farmers were desperate enough to join with the black farmers and laborers, then the Bourbon's entire privileged way of life was threatened.

So it is not surprising that when Bourbons began talking of a new constitution that would disfranchise black voters and guarantee that no black-white coalition would defeat the Democrats, Black Belt leaders were less than enthusiastic. Outside the Black Belt, conservative Democrats had concluded that "honest elections" (elections they could win) were possible only if "corruptible voters" (those who might someday vote against them) were removed from the rolls.

They were not troubled by the fact that they seemed to be saying that the best way to keep the white man from stealing the black man's vote was to take the black man's vote away from him. Bourbon Democrats knew what they wanted to do, and intended to do it.

Or, as the Teacher's resource guide at the Alabama Archives Web site puts it:

The entrenched "Bourbons" had maintained control during that period through a combination of intimidating African Americans, raising the specter of "black rule" to keep whites within the party, and fraudulently counting votes for conservative candidates when all else failed. Uncomfortable with the turmoil and subterfuge of these campaigns, many leaders of the conservative Democrats embraced calls for a new constitution as a way to ensure "honest elections" -- by legally taking the vote away from blacks so that they would not have to be stolen. 

So they're uncomfortable with stealing votes, but not disenfranchising voters. Amazing, isn't it?

And so in November of 1900, the Legislature approved a statewide vote in April, 1901 call for a Constitutional Convention.

Opposition came mainly from North Alabama mountain areas and the Wiregrass - areas that didn't have a tradition of "plantation" life and large landowners, but was instead made up of small farmers.  Those areas were, not surprisingly, strongholds of the Farmer's Alliance.

The Black Belt turned out in force for the Bourbon cause. Blacks voted, or were voted, in numbers that even caught the seasoned observers by surprise. In Lowndes County, where black voters held a 5 to 1 advantage over whites, 3,226 votes were cast for the convention and only 338 against it. In Dallas, Green, Perry, Hale, Sumter, and Marengo counties, returns were much the same.

The delegates went right to work in May, 1901 and produced a document that disenfranchised black voters and many white voters, and wrote the tax code into the Constitution, making funding for education and economic development difficult - if not impossible - for some counties:

Black disfranchisement took up much of the convention's time and was the subject of considerable debate, but it was not the only issue. Determined to preserve a status quo under which they had prospered, Bourbons refused to raise the tax ceiling to provide more funds for state and local governments and did not lift restrictions on state support for internal improvements. Counties could use local funds to build roads, bridges and public buildings, but limits placed on what they could borrow made such projects difficult to carry out.

Put simply, state and local governments would remain starved for revenue, and the service they provided, especially in education, would be underfunded for the foreseeable future.

One interesting aside..... the literacy requirements and other tests for voting were going to penalize poor whites just as much as black voters, so the writers placed several "exceptions" into the voting requirements:

Poor whites who might have been disqualified were allowed to slip through if they or an ancestor had served in the military (the "grandfather clause") or, failing that, if they were of "good character" and understood "the duties of citizenship in a republican form of government" - qualifications that black Alabamians at the whim of white election officials had little hope of meeting. 

Now, when I hear that something has been "grandfathered in" on existing legislation or ordinances, I'll always think of Alabama's 1901 Constitution.

Once written, it had to be ratified. Under the banner of "White Supremacy, Honest Elections and the New Constitution," the Democrats rallied their forces. Opposition came from those who saw that, in time, suffrage restrictions would be applied to poor whites as well as to blacks. But opponents seemed to know that no matter how many votes their side received, the Black Belt would deliver more.

They were right.

The constitution was ratified 108,613 to 81,734 - a majority of 26,879. Outside the Black Belt, the constitution lost, but in the plantation counties, ratification got the votes to turn the tide.

And what's the result?  Hill Carmichael, a great-grandson of one of the signers - Archibald Hill Carmichael - is one of the leading proponents for constitution reform in Alabama. In a 2007 op-ed piece he said:

The 1901 Constitution is no more personal to me than it is to hundreds of local leaders in Alabama who cannot do what they know is best for their cities and counties without first asking Montgomery for permission.

  • It is personal to the thousands of Alabamians who, as they struggle to make ends meet, are forced to pay absurdly high sales taxes on basic necessities like food, medicine and baby supplies.
  • It is personal to the public schoolteacher who holds her breath and crosses her fingers every year, hoping and praying that our highly volatile tax revenues are high enough to avoid another year of proration and outdated textbooks.
  • And it is very personal to the thousands of schoolchildren languishing in underfunded schools in the Black Belt, for whom the American Dream will be deferred until the adults decide to scrap a system of taxation that is doing exactly what it was designed to do: keep the wealthy landowners in their rural counties from paying their fair share of taxes.

The Constitution of 1875 wasn't great.  It concentrated power in Montgomery, robbing cities and counties of local control.  Indeed, in 1900, there was already grumbling that "local bills" consumed the Legislature's time instead of dealing with pressing state matters.

But the framers of the 1901 Constitution refused to fix even that.  They took a bad document and made it even worse.  And they made it almost impossible to change the system.

Thus, Alabama has been burdened throughout the 20th Century with a document that should have shamed people who lived hundreds of years before.  It's 2010 and - look! - we still have it, and not a single candidate for governor is willing to be the champion for reform.

It's time for citizens to say no.  Yes, Alabama has pressing issues: education, economic development, transportation.... and every single effort to address them on the state and local level is hamstrung by our 1901 Constitution. Until we fix it, the state will continue to be almost ungovernable and the political system resistant to citizens' initiatives and calls for reform.

I'll let Hill Carmichael have the last word on this:

By our complacency, we reratify the 1901 Constitution every year.

Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Share |

Wow!!! (4.00 / 2)
If I wasn't for Constitution Reform prior to reading this, I sure would be now.  Powerful!!!

OMG! How embarrassing. (3.50 / 2)

I'm mortified that this was ever the slogan of the Democratic Party in Alabama:

White Supremacy, Honest Elections, and the New Constitution, One and Inseparable

Unfortunately, we are still fighting the vestiges of those sentiments, as well as the regressive, non-democratic provisions they managed to codify in the state constitution.

Work harder and work smarter!

"divide and conquer" (3.67 / 3)
That was the slogan then.  And sadly, it may be the slogan for November.....

"The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness."  - John Kenneth Galbraith

It has been the slogan for thousands of years (4.00 / 2)

Ever since there has been a divide between the masses that make and the elites that take.

The 1901 Alabama constitution is one more instance of the iron law of human politics.

Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.
- John Adams

[ Parent ]
Democrat or No (3.50 / 2)
Are you trying to convince me not to become a Democrat? Chase me out of state?  

I began reading the constitution, and oh my damn, humans wrote that?  It makes the Hittites seem progressive, so far.

Is it the limestone in the water?

There are other southern states where the populace is non progressive, even ultra conservative, but not as - may I say it? - stupid.  I can't say that this constitution is preserved because of the ignorance of the populace because I have heard well educated folk resist changing it.

When I left Alabama I was a Republican, party of little influence here, progressives, liberals, or anyone left, vocally, publically, didn't exist, or didn't seem to exist, and I didn't expect to return to the state.  My use, misuse, of commas limns the tortuous thought processes when I think of Alabama and why I remain here.

If I was a reasonable person I'd move out of this state.

Poor folk, working poor, and middle class vote for the benefit of the rich here too often.

Why should I stay here? I used to wake up each morn and say, I am a dead man, to remind myself of the transitory nature of my life.

Now, I awake and say, why am I in this state that’s number one for fat people and at the bottom for education?

From my subjective observation the poor are fatter than the well off and the rich.

I am reading the state constitution and will post my initial reading. I expect that it may require repeated readings, and help from you folk.  

I discovered in the primary that old line black political clubs(?) behave badly too, maybe.

Qui bibit, dormit; qui dormit, non peccat; qui non peccat, sanctus est; ergo qui bibit sanctus est.

Just writing about the history.... (4.00 / 2)

I wouldn't draw a straight line from the Alabama Democratic Party of 100+ years ago and the one we have.

Yes, I have serious problems with some of the people in it, but they aren't "dedicated to white supremacy" so that's a big couple of steps forward.

I think the lesson from this is that once people get in power, they want to stay there.  Period.  And sometimes they're willing to do and say some pretty unsavory things to keep their power.  That's true even for those who started out as reformers.  It could even happen to us!

off topic: LIA will be in Scottsboro on Saturday for the Juneteenth Celebration at the Scottsboro Boys Museum.  It starts at 10am.  We'd love to meet you if you can make it!

"The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness."  - John Kenneth Galbraith

[ Parent ]
I've already known all of this by reading Wayne Flynt's book "Alabama in the Twentith Century" when it came out in 2003 (4.00 / 1)

However, reading this all over again in the cliff notes-version is just as depressing as it was the first time.  This is one of the reasons why I can't see myself staying in Alabama.

I've tried to work against the system here, but the current slate of interest groups outside of the ACCR seem to care more about the preservation of their power and candidates that kowtow to their interests rather than helping the people. 

The reasons I can't comprehend why people listen to the AEA, ADC, NSC, ALFA, etc. and their smear campaigns against reasonably, progressive candidates (within Alabama political standards).   

Another thing that defeats Alabama is its citizenry's knee-jerk reaction to be suspicious of new candidates for public office because of lack of name recognition.  Too many people let single-issues or whisper-smear campaigns destroy the talented few who attempt to challenge the system and status quo.  It's 

It will take the dying out of a number of current figureheads and power players along with a massive campaign addressing of the level of discernment of the citizenry before things can be challenged and there some strides of applicable progress.  Alabamians in general need to stop being so sheeple-ish towards interest groups, stop relying on only name recognition as the only qualification as reason to vote for someone, and start thinking for themselves while formulating a broader scope of the big picture.  Alabama is hurting and will continue to hurt if the people don't wake up from always listening to others and thinking for themselves on issues affecting them.

For me, there is too much of the world to see before I stay in Alabama my entire life fighting this practically impossible battle during my lifetime.   


"Hypocrites are those whom pick and choose prejudices while giving accolades for their own..."

"It is what it is."  


You've put your finger on a huge problem (0.00 / 0)
Alabama's brain drain.  Too many young, capable, well-intentioned people are leaving Alabama.  Part of it is lack of jobs, but a significant problem is that people who can leave want to leave.  Our image is not good and the reality isn't actually any better than the image.

Work harder and work smarter!

[ Parent ]



blog advertising is good for you


Be part of the state's largest & fastest growing Democratic grassroots organization. To receive our newsletter, text OTMDEMS to 22828. Follow us on Facebook.



Advanced Search

A community blog for progressive politics, ideas and current events in Alabama. Register now to join the conversation.

Friend and Follow Left In Alabama:

Join LIA's Facebook Page Go To LIA's Twitter Page Go To LIA's Flickr Photo Album Go To LIA's YouTube channel

- Mobile

Make a New Account



Forget your username or password?

LiA Contributors
- Admin
- Admin
- Economics & Aeronautics
- National Political Issues
- Political Strategy & Messaging
- Health Care
- Education in the Black Belt
- ADP Watch
- Climate & Alternative Energy
- Labor
- Alabama Legal Issues
- From the Center
- Equal Rights & GLBT Issues
- Roving Reporter

Please take our Blog Reader Project survey.

Support Left in Alabama with a Donation!

Your Amazon purchases can help fund this blog:
Support Left in Alabama
Buy Phones & More at Amazon Wireless


T.H.E. Social Work Agency
Adoption home studies & care management services in the North Alabama area.
Licensed, certified, caring social workers.

blog advertising is good for you

Bessemer Opinions
Birmingham Blues
Birmingham Science Examiner
Greg Varner's Blog
The Haze Filter
Hard Boiled Dreams of the World
King Cockfight
Legal Schnauzer
Loretta Nall
Peace Takes Courage
Pippa Abston's Blog
TJ Beitel
Thoughts & Rants of an Independent
Time is Spherical, Not Linear
WriteChic Press

ACLU of Alabama
Alabama Arise
Alabama Citizens for Constitutional Reform
Alabama Conservationist
Alabama Democratic Conference
Alabama Democratic Party
Alabama Legislature
Alabama Poverty Project
Alabama Secretary of State's Office
Encyclopedia of Alabama
Equality Alabama
Greater Birmingham Ministries
League of Women Voters of Alabama
Madison County Democrats
Marshall County Democrats
Over the Mountain Democrats
Alabama Political Reporter

Blog for Democracy
Blue Oklahoma
Burnt Orange Report
Daily Kingfish
Facing South
The Old Black Church
West Virginia Blue
Juanita Jean - Texas

Anzalone Liszt Research
Center for American Progress
FEC Electronic Report Retrieval
Follow the Money
In Their Boots
New Organizing Institute
Pew Research Center
Progressive States Network
The Contributor


 Subscribe in a reader

Add to My AOL

Powered by FeedBurner

Powered by: SoapBlox