Left In Alabama   Follow leftinbama on Twitter

House Minority Leader Craig Ford (D) Makes the Case for Voting NO on Sept. 18

by: mooncat

Sat Sep 08, 2012 at 11:12:47 AM CDT

Vote Yes or elseIt's been frustrating for the past month or so to watch progressive groups like Alabama ARISE and Alabama Appleseed, not to mention several editorial pages around the state, first deplore the irresponsible behavior that set up the lose-lose choice facing voters on September 18th, point out that it is nothing more than a band-aid, virtually call it blackmail and then advise voters to go along with the blackmailers, pay the ransom to save essential programs like Medicaid and vote YES to let legislators use the Alabama Trust Fund to balance the state's operating budget.  All the while knowing this will just kick the can down the road to some even worse budget crisis in a few years.  Where is their backbone?

Craig FordWell, State Rep. Craig Ford (D, Gadsden) must have listened to Deval Patrick's speech Wednesday night at the Democratic Convention ...

“if we want to earn the privilege to lead, it’s time for Democrats to grow a backbone and stand up for what we believe.”

... because Ford is not waffling on the Sept. 18th constitutional amendment.  He not only says very clearly that he will be voting NO, he urges the rest of us to do the same ...

I urge you to vote NO on September 18 and urge the Governor to call a special session to require the legislature to work TOGETHER to find a permanent solution to our state’s funding needs. You elected us to make the hard choices and decisions NOW, not to kick the can down the road three years.

Ford eschewed the usual mumblings about dire consequences and how we can't trust the Legislature to actually fix anything and instead makes the case that voting NO on September 18 is the more responsible course.

First, this amendment will not solve Medicaid’s or the prison system’s financial problems; it only delays the problems for three years (funny how that happens to coincide with the 2014 elections). After three years, Alabamians will be right back where we are now with even higher costs. This amendment is a short-term fix to a long-term problem. It is a temporary bailout of Medicaid and the Alabama prison system.

Secondly, this amendment does not require the borrowed money to be paid back. The amendment allows the state to transfer, or borrow, $145.8 million dollars each year for the next three years from the Alabama Trust Fund to the General Fund. While the governor and some legislative leaders have said they will support legislation requiring the money be paid back to the Alabama Trust Fund, the amendment does not REQUIRE it. I believe we need more than just their assurances; we need the repayment to be a requirement. And if they are serious about paying the money back, then why was the repayment requirement not part of the original amendment? Do you trust your elected officials to pay the money back without it being required by law?

Thirdly, Alabama’s General Fund budget relies on money from the interest payments we receive on the Trust Fund. The Alabama Trust Fund was established to collect royalties from oil and gas exploration in the Gulf of Mexico. This amendment would take nearly one-fifth of the money out of the Trust Fund, which will drastically reduce the interest payments. Lower interest payments results in even less money for the General Fund budget in the coming years.

Then Craig Ford goes further, calling out the dishonest rhetoric of the Republican supermajority:

Republican leaders have been selling this amendment to the voters of Alabama by arguing that without it, the state will not have enough money for vital services like Medicaid. Yet, at the same time they have been making this argument, these same Republican leaders have been traveling the state telling us how they are going to cut a billion dollars from the state budgets (mostly from cuts to teachers and education support personnel, law enforcement, firefighters, and other public servants).

So which is it? Does the state have so much money that we can afford to cut a billion dollars in government spending? Or are we so financially strapped for cash that we have to raid the Trust Fund of $437 million dollars (almost half of what Republicans say they are going to cut from the budgets)?

Republican leaders like to claim that they are fiscally conservative, but raiding the state’s savings account to the tune of $437 million to bailout the prison system and Medicaid is not fiscally conservative.

Make no mistake, the choice on September 18th is a bad one.  Either dip into the Trust Fund for a short term band-aid to Alabama's broken budget with no guarantee the money will ever be paid back, or trust Republicans to go back to the drawing board and actually solve the problem.

I say Ford is right, the Governor should call the Legislature into special session and challenge them to find the needed revenue and craft a permanent solution to the perennial problem of budget shortfalls.  The Democratic proposal to "close corporate tax loopholes used by out of state companies to rob the people of Alabama from deserved revenue" is a very good place to start.  Give Alabama Republicans a chance to put their money where their mouths are on bipartisanship, and put their constituents ahead of their pledge to Grover Norquist, and raise enough revenue to pay our bills.

mooncat :: House Minority Leader Craig Ford (D) Makes the Case for Voting NO on Sept. 18
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Share |

Problem is-- (4.00 / 2)

Will the Guv and his cohorts heed this call for a special session?

I'm not holding my breath on this one.

comment (4.00 / 1)
The amendment will not pass. The Federal Government will likely take over Medicade and maybe the prison system - If Bently and the pubs refuse to create revenue.

PERHAPS (4.00 / 2)
. . .  a Federal takeover isn't such a bad idea. At least they have standards.

[ Parent ]
The possibility of a Federal takeover (4.00 / 2)
makes me wonder:  Is this Bentley's version of Wallace's "stand at the schoolhouse door?"

[ Parent ]
Big Pile of Money (4.00 / 1)

It is indeed a bad choice any way you cut it, but if what happened to the PACT money and any other pile of money the Republicans get their hands on is any indication, you can be sure they'll squander it away and not pay it back.

Republicans seem to do this more often than not - create some crisis as a way to get their hands on a "pile of money" that they just have to control.

That's why they seem to be working so hard to get at Medicare. They almost got a good toe-hold with that blasted doughnut hole. That whole situation is a very good indication of what they intend to do with the whole program if they can ever get their greedy hands on all of that money.

I'd almost be willing to bet you that if they get their hands on that Trust Fund money, they will find some way not to take care of prisons, Medicaid or other vital services that they are dangling in front of us right now as a means to get our sympathies. And, as Ford indicates, if there is no legal requirement to pay it back, I believe they won't.

If past is prologue, I have to vote no.

Please consider doing the same.

If a special session is called.... (4.00 / 1)
...then the legislators should NOT be paid until they fix their mess.  (I actually support not paying these do-nothings, ESPECIALLY the GOPers who apparently only saw being elected in November 2010 as a way of getting free money without having to do anything for it, unti after thel 2014 elections.  I know that's never going to happen but it would certainly be nice.)

republiCon way (0.00 / 0)
Isn't it the republiCon way to raid funds? They have not even passed a provision that requires the money to ever be paid back. Does this sound like Bain in Alabama? Don't forget that the people passed a bill that required the legislature to pass the budget before any other business was conducted.... well, what happenened to that? They ignored it and wanted to deal with the main republicon issue of abortion.

Same old crap... (4.00 / 1)
How many flipping times are the GOPs going to sell us a bill of goods? And worse yet, how many times are we going to buy those goods? One day they don't want federal money, next day they take it for a tornado, hurricane and heavy wind. So we can't have federal funding if we don't save Medicaid? Am I hearing this right? When are the donkeys gonna have enough and start bucking THEIR system? I am so exhausted with telling Alabamians the same old thing. They want their money grubbin controlling fingers on every last dollar. This private partnership and tax incentives are killing us. They talk about us putting the country in debt, but they're robbing Peter and not even trying to pay Paul. So tell me, whats in it for legislation supporting this? GOP thrives on the desperation of the lowly, basks in the sunshine of long suffering and rejoices at the prolonged anticipation of beggars... So, why are they not shouting at the chance to inflict more pIn? again... What's in this for them and don't tell me they're looking out for the people because those people lost hope and trust in our system after the last 34 disappointments. I'm in total shock. Someone put their horseshoe back on their hoof and start kicking... This ain't right!  



blog advertising is good for you


Be part of the state's largest & fastest growing Democratic grassroots organization. To receive our newsletter, text OTMDEMS to 22828. Follow us on Facebook.



Advanced Search

A community blog for progressive politics, ideas and current events in Alabama. Register now to join the conversation.

Friend and Follow Left In Alabama:

Join LIA's Facebook Page Go To LIA's Twitter Page Go To LIA's Flickr Photo Album Go To LIA's YouTube channel

- Mobile

Make a New Account



Forget your username or password?

LiA Contributors
- Admin
- Admin
- Economics & Aeronautics
- National Political Issues
- Political Strategy & Messaging
- Health Care
- Education in the Black Belt
- ADP Watch
- Climate & Alternative Energy
- Labor
- Alabama Legal Issues
- From the Center
- Equal Rights & GLBT Issues
- Roving Reporter

Please take our Blog Reader Project survey.

Support Left in Alabama with a Donation!

Your Amazon purchases can help fund this blog:
Support Left in Alabama
Buy Phones & More at Amazon Wireless


T.H.E. Social Work Agency
Adoption home studies & care management services in the North Alabama area.
Licensed, certified, caring social workers.

blog advertising is good for you

Bessemer Opinions
Birmingham Blues
Birmingham Science Examiner
Greg Varner's Blog
The Haze Filter
Hard Boiled Dreams of the World
King Cockfight
Legal Schnauzer
Loretta Nall
Peace Takes Courage
Pippa Abston's Blog
TJ Beitel
Thoughts & Rants of an Independent
Time is Spherical, Not Linear
WriteChic Press

ACLU of Alabama
Alabama Arise
Alabama Citizens for Constitutional Reform
Alabama Conservationist
Alabama Democratic Conference
Alabama Democratic Party
Alabama Legislature
Alabama Poverty Project
Alabama Secretary of State's Office
Encyclopedia of Alabama
Equality Alabama
Greater Birmingham Ministries
League of Women Voters of Alabama
Madison County Democrats
Marshall County Democrats
Over the Mountain Democrats
Alabama Political Reporter

Blog for Democracy
Blue Oklahoma
Burnt Orange Report
Daily Kingfish
Facing South
The Old Black Church
West Virginia Blue
Juanita Jean - Texas

Anzalone Liszt Research
Center for American Progress
FEC Electronic Report Retrieval
Follow the Money
In Their Boots
New Organizing Institute
Pew Research Center
Progressive States Network
The Contributor


 Subscribe in a reader

Add to My AOL

Powered by FeedBurner

Powered by: SoapBlox